医学研究与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 16-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2024.06.003

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂对急性心肌梗死预后影响的Meta分析

宋朕,陈蕊肖,吴婷婷,焦圣军,路陆,姚天宇,田野   

  1. 河北省沧州中西医结合医院心内三科, 河北 沧州 061000
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 出版日期:2024-12-25 发布日期:2024-12-25
  • 作者简介:宋朕(1993—),男,河北沧州人,主治医师,硕士,主要从事心血管相关疾病研究。 E-mail: sz_scy@163.com

  • Received:2024-10-09 Online:2024-12-25 Published:2024-12-25

摘要: 目的 探究钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(sodium-glucose co-transporter-2,SGTL-2)抑制剂对急性心肌梗死预后有利影响的可能性。方法 通过计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库、维普期刊数据库,筛选出符合纳入标准的随机对照研究,检索时间为建库至2024年8月。结局指标包括心力衰竭住院、全因死亡、心血管死亡、MACE事件、SGLT-2抑制剂相关不良反应。结果 共6篇随机对照研究纳入Meta分析,研究对象共11 012例。结果显示,急性心肌梗死后在标准治疗基础上加用SGLT-2抑制剂可减少心力衰竭住院风险(RR=0.76, 95%CI= 0.62~0.93, P=0.01),然而在全因死亡风险(RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.83~1.21, P=0.97)、心血管死亡风险(RR=1.01, 95%CI=0.82~1.25, P=0.92)、MACE事件风险(RR=1.03, 95%CI=0.87~1.21, P=0.76)、SGLT-2抑制剂相关不良反应方面(RR=1.03, 95%CI=0.96~1.10, P=0.38)与安慰剂相比,差异无统计学意义。结论 急性心肌梗死后在标准治疗基础上加用SGLT-2抑制剂是安全的,可降低心力衰竭住院风险,但在全因死亡、心血管死亡以及MACE事件风险方面未显著增加或降低。

关键词: 钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂, 急性心肌梗死, 随机对照研究, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To investigate the possibility of beneficial effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2(SGTL-2)inhibitors on prognosis after acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods Randomized controlled trails meeting the inclusion criteria were selected through computer searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Journal database from the establishment of the database to August 2024. Outcome indicators included: hospitalization for heart failure; all-cause death; cardiovascular death; MACE events; SGLT-2 inhibitor related adverse effects. Results A total of 6 randomized controlled trails were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 11 012 patients. The results showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors in addition to standard treatment after AMI reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure(RR=0.76, 95%CI=0.62~0.93, P=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause death(RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.83~1.21, P=0.97), cardiovascular death(RR=1.01, 95%CI=0.82~1.25, P=0.92), MACE events(RR=1.03, 95%CI=0.87~1.21, P=0.76), and SGLT-2 inhibitor related adverse effects(RR=1.03, 95%CI=0.96~1.10, P=0.38), compared with placebo. Conclusion The addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors to standard treatment after AMI is safe and can reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure after AMI, but the risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death and MACE events are not significantly increased or decreased.

Key words: sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, acute myocardial infarction, randomized controlled trail, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: