医学研究与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 12-19.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2026.05.002

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

ROX指数联合VOX指数预测急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者气管插管时机的研究

瞿海龙,张玲玲,李建奇,张红强   

  1. 河北大学附属医院急诊医学科, 河北 保定 071000
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-22 发布日期:2026-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 张红强(1986—), 男,河北高阳人,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事急救医学临床与科研。E-mail: 15720088803@hbu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:瞿海龙(1976—), 男,河北涞水人,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事急救医学临床与科研。 E-mail: hailongju@hbu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    保定市科技计划自筹经费项目(2441ZF098)

Study on combining the ROX index and VOX index to predict the timing of tracheal intubation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Ju Hailong, Zhang Lingling, Li Jianqi, Zhang Hongqiang   

  1. Emergency Department, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2026-05-22 Published:2026-10-21

摘要: 目的 探讨ROX指数(SpO2/FiO2/RR)联合VOX指数(SpO2/FiO2/VT)对急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, AHRF)患者气管插管时机的预测价值。方法 选择2024年4月至2026年4月在河北大学附属医院急诊监护病房收治的AHRF患者107例,根据住院期间是否接受气管插管治疗,将患者分为插管组(54例)和未插管组(53例)。比较2组患者的一般资料以及插管组插管前、未插管组住院期间最差的ROX指数与VOX指数。采用多因素Logistic回归分析AHRF患者气管插管的独立危险因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线评估ROX指数、VOX指数及二者联合的预测效能,并确定最佳截断值。结果 2组患者性别、年龄、病史及入院时白细胞、血红蛋白、血小板、凝血酶原时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。插管组患者的丙氨酸氨基转移酶、呼吸频率(respiratory rate, RR)高于未插管组,脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2)、动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of arterial oxygen, PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, PaCO2)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)、ROX指数、VOX指数低于未插管组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,ROX指数(OR=0.672,95%CI:0.451~0.991,P<0.05)和VOX指数(OR=0.351,95%CI:0.150~0.906,P<0.05)是AHRF患者需要气管插管的影响因素。ROC曲线分析显示,ROX指数、VOX指数与二者联合预测气管插管的曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)分别为0.710、0.800和0.900,二者联合预测的AUC大于单一指标(P<0.05),最佳截断值分别为3.752、21.031与0.420。经Bootstrap内部验证校正后AUC为0.890,模型稳定性良好。结论 ROX指数、VOX指数是预测AHRF患者需要气管插管的有效指标,二者联合应用能显著提高预测效能,有助于临床医师更精准地把握气管插管时机。

关键词: ROX指数, VOX指数, 低氧性呼吸衰竭, 气管插管

Abstract: Objective To investigate the predictive value of the ROX index(SpO2/FiO2/RR)combined with the VOX index(SpO2/FiO2/VT)for the timing of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(AHRF). Methods A total of 107 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(AHRF)admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit of the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from April 2024 to April 2026 were enrolled. Based on whether they received invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation during hospitalization, the patients were divided into an intubation group(n=54)and a non-intubation group(n=53). General data of the two groups were compared, as well as the ROX index and VOX index—measured before intubation in the intubation group and the worst value during hospitalization in the non-intubation group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for endotracheal intubation in AHRF patients. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of the ROX index, the VOX index, and their combination, and the optimal cutoff values were determined.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, medical history, or admission levels of white blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count, and prothrombin time(P>0.05). Patients in the intubation group had higher alanine aminotransferase and respiratory rate(RR)than those in the non intubation group, while pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2), oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2), ROX index, and VOX index were lower in the intubation group(P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ROX index(OR=0.672, 95%CI: 0.451-0.991, P<0.05)and the VOX index(OR=0.351, 95% CI: 0.150-0.906, P<0.05)were influencing factors for the need for endotracheal intubation in AHRF patients. ROC curve analysis revealed that the areas under the curve(AUC)for the ROX index, the VOX index, and their combination in predicting endotracheal intubation were 0.710, 0.800, and 0.900, respectively. The AUC of the combined model was significantly greater than that of either single index(P<0.05), and the optimal cutoff values were 3.752, 21.031, and 0.420, respectively. After internal validation by Bootstrap, the bias corrected AUC was 0.890, indicating good model stability.Conclusion The ROX index and VOX index are effective indicators for predicting the need for endotracheal intubation in patients with AHRF. Their combined use significantly improves predictive performance and helps clinicians more accurately determine the optimal timing for endotracheal intubation.

Key words: ROX index, VOX index, hypoxemic respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation

中图分类号: