MDT模式下PBL教学法在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2016.04.014

医学研究与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 66-70.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2016.04.014

MDT模式下PBL教学法在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中的应用

周洋¹,张振²,刘志云³

1.新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院骨与软组织科, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
2.新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院医学工程教研室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
3.新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院医务部, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2016-05-06 出版日期:2016-08-25 发布日期:2016-08-25
通讯作者: 刘志云(1967—),男,甘肃武威人,副主任医师,主要从事医院管理与医学教育研究。 E-mail: torreszy@aliyun.com
作者简介:周洋(1981—),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,讲师,主治医师,博士,主要从事骨与软组织肿瘤的诊治与教学。 E-mail: 54656085@qq.com

Application of PBL combined with MDT in clinical teaching of bone tumor

ZHOU Yang¹,ZHANG Zhen²,LIU Zhiyun³

1.Department of Bone and Tissue, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi 830011, China; 2.Department of Medical Engineering, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi 830011, China; 3.Medical Affairs Department, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi 830011, China

Received:2016-05-06 Online:2016-08-25 Published:2016-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中应用多学科综合诊疗(multidiciplinary treatment,MDT)模式下PBL教学法的教学效果。方法选取新疆医科大学五年制医学影像专业在新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院进行骨肿瘤疾病临床示教学生共 75名,按班级分为实验组(MDT模式下PBL组)和对照组(传统教学LBL组),分别按照各组教学方式进行临床示教,比较2组教学效果和学生满意度的差别。结果(1)MDT模式下PBL组理论成绩与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(43.13±4.12 vs 42.76±3.05,P>0.05),但临床思维成绩实验组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(40.28±3.52 vs 36.13±2.88,P<0.05);(2)在活跃课堂气氛、提高自主学习能力、提高语言表达能力、提高沟通交往能力、提升自信心方面,实验组的满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MDT模式下PBL教学法在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中效果良好,学生满意度较高,符合现代医学教育理念,可以在骨肿瘤临床教学中推广。

关键词: 以问题为基础的教学方法, 多学科综合诊疗, 临床教学, 骨肿瘤

Abstract: Objective To explore the teaching effects of application of PBL combined with MDT(multidiciplinary treatment,MDT)pattern in clinical teaching of bone tumor. Methods 75 Medical imaging specialty students who were in Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University performing bone tumor clinical practice were selected.Then they were divided into control group(the traditional teaching group,LBL group)and experimental group(PBL+MDT group)according to their classes.Each group received training of clinical bone tumor respectively according to the corresponding teaching method.The teaching effects and students' satisfaction about teaching in the two groups were compared. Results(1)The theoretical test results in PBL+MDT group did not significantly differ from those in the control group(43.13±4.12 vs 42.76±3.05,P>0.05).However,the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in score of comprehensive case analysis(40.28±3.52 vs 36.13±2.88,P<0.05).(2)Investigation and analysis showed that the students in the experimental group had significantly greater satisfaction than those in the control group in terms of classroom atmosphere,self-learning ability,language competence,oral communication skill and self-confidence(P<0.05). Conclusion PBL combined with MDT pattern applied in clinical teaching of bone tumor has good effects,and it suits the modern concept of medical education.Therefore,it is worth popularizing in clinical teaching of bone tumor.

Key words: PBL, MDT, clinical teaching, bone tumor

中图分类号:

G642

周洋,张振,刘志云. MDT模式下PBL教学法在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中的应用[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2016, 33(4): 66-70.

ZHOU Yang,ZHANG Zhen,LIU Zhiyun. Application of PBL combined with MDT in clinical teaching of bone tumor[J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2016, 33(4): 66-70.

[1]	周程，刘福林，周晓东，许金鹏. PBL 教学法在心脏外科教学中的应用[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2015, 32(1): 95-99.
[2]	黄礼年,许启霞,张永,胡俊锋,高华,陈余清. Seminar和案例教学结合在呼吸科临床型研究生临床教学中的应用[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2013, 30(5): 92-94.
[3]	赵文英. 在临床教学中培养学生循证思维[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2012, 29(6): 79-82.
[4]	谷新忠,南凯,刁磊,郝利锋,朱太平. 河北省本科临床教学现状调查分析[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2011, 28(6): 85-88.
[5]	张增学,乔艳华,李伟,杨爱强. 深化高校教学医院内涵建设确保医学生临床实习质量[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2011, 28(3): 89-94,101.
[6]	张新平,赵海静,阎彩珍,郑吉敏. PBL教学法在内科学临床教学的应用研究[J]. 医学研究与教育, 2009, 26(1): 108-110.

MDT模式下PBL教学法在骨肿瘤疾病临床教学中的应用

Application of PBL combined with MDT in clinical teaching of bone tumor

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价