医学研究与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 30-33.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2018.06.006

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

通过便携式肺量计观测AECOPD患者住院期间肺功能变化

韩力,魏丽,缪雅芳,陈昊,周超   

  1. 上海健康医学院附属上海市浦东新区周浦医院, 上海 201318
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-11 出版日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2018-12-25
  • 作者简介:韩力(1976—),男,山西阳泉人,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事慢性气道疾病及肺血管疾病的研究和诊治。 E-mail: agab40@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    上海健康医学种子基金项目(HMSF-17-22-038);上海健康医学院师资人才百人库培养计划项目(ZPBRK-18-08)

  • Received:2017-10-11 Online:2018-12-25 Published:2018-12-25

摘要: 目的 借助便携式肺量计对比观察同期住院的慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期(acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases,AECOPD)与肺炎患者的肺功能变化,并探讨其对于AECOPD住院患者诊治的帮助。方法 于入院当天、入院3 d后、出院前24 h内分别对同期住院的20例AECOPD患者和15例肺炎患者借助简易肺量计进行动态肺功能检测,包括FEV1/FVC(1秒率)、FEV1%pred(1秒量比)、PEF等指标。患者每项指标计算出前后差值。结果 肺炎患者平均的FEV1%pred改善为6.60%±0.82%,AECOPD组平均的FEV1%pred改善为12.30%±1.66%,2组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.009),提示住院期间FEV1%pred得到明显改善;2组之间PEF变异率的差异有统计学意义(P=0.002),肺炎患者PEF变异率为24.50%±4.01%,AECOPD组PEF变异率为45.37%±4.44%,提示部分AECOPD患者具有气道高反应性;2组之间FEV1/FVC治疗前后差值比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.209)。结论 COPD患者在急性加重期出现肺通气功能下降,但在病情平稳后会有一定程度的恢复,故对COPD患者的肺功能评估宜在病情缓解后进行或复测,以利准确评估病情。

关键词: 便携式肺量计, 肺功能, 慢性阻塞性肺病, 急性加重

Abstract: Objective To observe and compare pulmonary function changes of patients were between acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)group and pneumonia group assisted by portable spirometer, then to explore its benefit for diagnosis and treatment in AECOPD in-patients. Methods 20 patients with AECOPD and 15 contemporaneous patients with pneumonia were examined and underwent pulmonary function test through portable spirometer on the 1st day, 3rd day and the last day, respectively. Three indicators including FEV1/FVC, FEV1%pred, PEF were detected and compared with each other. Difference were calculated. Results The average of improvement in FEV1 demonstrated significant difference between two groups. 6.60%±0.82% of FEV1%pred improvement were shown in pneumonia group compared with 12.30%±1.66% in AECOPD group(P=0.009), which means FEV1 elevation during the hospitalization. The variation of PEF demonstrated significant difference between two groups(P=0.002). 24.50%±4.01% of PEF variation was shown in pneumonia group while 45.37%±4.44% shown in AECOPD group, which means part of them have airway hyperreactivity. No significant difference of ΔFEV1/FVC(difference of before and after)was shown between AECOPD group and pneumonia group(P=0.209).Conclusion AECOPD could cause decreasement of ventilatory function in inpatients, who would usually obtain a certain rehabilitation after stabilization. Therefore, it is necessary to fulfill pulmonary function test after recovery again and then helpful to accurate assessment for AECOPD patients.

Key words: portable spirometer, pulmonary function, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbation

中图分类号: