医学研究与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 26-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2015.03.006

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种不同前方牵引矫治器矫治替牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错的临床 研究

冉屹东,刘璇   

  1. 保定市第二医院口腔科,河北 保定 071051
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-22 修回日期:2016-01-22 出版日期:2015-06-25 发布日期:2015-06-25
  • 作者简介:冉屹东(1971—),女,河北保定人,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事口腔医学研究。E-mail: ranyidong@126.com

Clinical study of maxillary protraction appliance combined with modified Nance arch and maxillary protraction and rapid palatal expansion in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion

RAN Yidong, LIU Xuan   

  1. Department of stomatoiogy, the No.2 Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2016-01-22 Revised:2016-01-22 Online:2015-06-25 Published:2015-06-25

摘要: 目的 临床研究改良 Nance 弓前方牵引矫治器和树脂冠腭开展前方牵引矫治器,观察这两种不同形式的前方牵引对替牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错治疗前后骨骼、牙齿、面型的变化,评价其临床矫治效果。方法 选择24 例替牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错畸形患者,分别应用改良Nance 弓前方牵引矫治器和树脂冠腭开展前方牵引矫治器进行治疗, 通过两组X 线头颅侧位片进行测量,比较治疗前后软硬组织的变化。结果 两个治疗组SNA、ANB、NA-PA、Ptm-A 均增大,A 点分别前移1.99 mm和2.61 mm,且有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 两种前方牵引矫治器治疗替牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错均有效,有利于Ⅲ类骨骼的调整,但树脂冠腭开展前方牵引组A 点前移较多。

关键词: 骨性Ⅲ类错, 前方牵引矫治器 , 替牙早期, 头影测量分析

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical investigation of maxillary protraction appliance combined with modified Nance arch and maxillary protraction and rapid palatal expansion andevaluate the changes of patients with skeletal class III malocclusion in skeletal ,dental, profile and before and after the treatment to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Methods 24 patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition were divided into two groups who were treated with maxillaryprotraction combined with modified Nance arch and maxillary protraction and rapid palatal expansion.Cephalometric radiographs were analyzed to evaluate skeletodental and profile changes before and after treatment. Results SNA and ANB angle, NA-PA, Ptm-A, were increased and subspinales wereprotracted by 1.99 mm and 2.61 mm. All of the changes were statistically significant (P<0.05).Results Both of the maxillary protraction combined with modified Nance arch.andmaxillary protraction and rapid palatal expansion were obviously effective for skeletal class III malocclusion in mixed dentition, but maxillary protraction and rapid palatal expansion are much better in protracting subspinales.

Key words: skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, maxillary protraction appliance, maxillary protraction appliance; cephalometric analysis

中图分类号: