医学研究与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 75-80.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2019.02.014

• 教育教学 • 上一篇    

某省会城市省级医学重点(发展)学科科技奖励现状分析

张怡宁1,崔泽2,刘琳3,张哲3,钱卫国4,王淑芬5,卢安 2   

  1. 1.华北理工大学管理学院, 河北 唐山 063210;
    2.河北省疾病预防控制中心, 河北 石家庄050021;
    3.河北省卫生健康委员会科教处, 河北 石家庄 050051;
    4.河北省胸科医院, 河北 石家庄 050048;
    5.河北大学公共卫生学院, 河北 保定 071000
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2019-04-25 发布日期:2019-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 卢安(1962—),男,满族,河北承德人,硕士,主要从事卫生事业管理。E-mail: l-an@163.com
  • 作者简介:张怡宁(1992—),女,河北邢台人,在读硕士,主要从事卫生事业管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20110025)

  • Received:2019-02-20 Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-04-25

摘要: 目的 了解某省会城市省级医学重点(发展)学科科技奖励现状,探讨存在的问题及对策。方法 主要采用文献研究、描述性研究、秩和检验等方法对重点(发展)学科科技奖励进行现状分析。 结果 2012年至2014年获奖数量较为平稳,2015年各项奖励均有下降。临床医学的获奖数量和级别较高,高于基础医学和预防医学与卫生学。科技奖励第一完成人中,35~45岁组占51.8%;正高级职称的占48.74%;硕士学位的占43.88%,博士学位的占42.81%。 结论 科技奖励数量出现降低趋势,且奖励级别偏低;科技奖励集中在优势学科;第一完成人职称偏高;第一完成人以中青年为主,但高级别奖励第一完成人年龄偏高。建议:加强科研管理,提高科研成果报奖积极性和报奖材料的写作水平;对同专业、同领域的重点(发展)学科进行横向比较,选出龙头学科进行重点投入;积极培养中青年科研人才,提高中青年人才的科研水平。

关键词: 医学重点学科, 科技奖励, 获奖成果

Abstract: Objective To understand the status of technology awards of the key medical disciplines at provincial level in a provincial capital city, and to explore the existing problems and countermeasures. Method The paper mainly used literature research, descriptive research, rank sum test to analyze the present situation of technology awards for key disciplines. Results The number of technology awards was relatively stable from 2012 to 2014, but declined in 2015. The number and level of technology awards in clinical medicine is higher than those in basic science of medicine, preventive medicine and hygienics. Among the leaders of technology awards, 51.8% aged ranging from 35 to 44; 48.74% were senior professional titles, 43.88% have master's degree, 42.81% have doctoral degree. Conclusion The number of science and technology awards is decreasing, and theaward level is low. Technology awards are concentrated in the dominant disciplines. The leaders of technology awards have higher professional titles.The leaders are mainly young and middle-aged, but those in high-level awards are older. Suggestions: Strengthen the management of scientific research, improve the enthusiasm of rewarding scientific research achievements and the writing level of rewarding materials. Make horizontal comparison with key disciplines in the same field and major disciplines, select leading disciplines for key investment. Actively cultivate young and middle-aged scientific research talents, and improve the scientific research level of young and middle-aged talents.

Key words: disciplines of medicine, science and technology awards, award-winning results

中图分类号: