医学研究与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 66-72.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2022.04.010

• 教育教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

形成性评价联合CBL在检验专业实习生教学中的应用

王东萍,吴洋,魏莲花,颜丽,李可可,叶华,李少华,孙延庆   

  1. 1.甘肃中医药大学, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2.甘肃省人民医院, 甘肃 兰州730000
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-17 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 孙延庆(1964—),男,甘肃兰州人,主任医师/教授,博士,主要从事医学生教育教学、血液病学研究、科普工作。E-mail: 40yanqingfang@163.com
  • 作者简介:王东萍(1986—),女,甘肃兰州人,主治医师/讲师,硕士,主要从事医学生教育、血液病学研究。 E-mail: 348014049@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃中医药大学2019年教学研究与教学改革立项课题(YBXM-26);兰州大学第二医院“萃英科技创新”计划(CY2019-QN15);甘肃省高等学校创新基金项目(2020B-040)

The application of formative evaluation and case-based learning in practice teaching of laboratory medicine technology

WANG Dongping,WU Yang,WEI Lianhua,YAN Li,LI Keke,YE Hua,LI Shaohua,SUN Yanqing   

  1. 1.Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2.Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2022-02-17 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-25

摘要: 目的 探讨形成性评价联合CBL应用在医学检验专业临床教学中的实践与效果。方法 选取 135名检验专业实习生,采用随机法分为3组(A组、B组和C组)。A组采用终结性评价+传统教学,B组采用终结性评价+CBL,C组采用形成性评价+CBL。从教学内容考核和教学效果问卷调查两个方面对3组的教学质量进行评估。结果 B组(82.6±4.7)和C组(85.2±4.4)实习生技能操作考试总成绩均高于A组(80.1±3.8),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),理论成绩B组(75.6±8.9)和C组(77.9±7.1)均高于A组(71.7±8.1),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但B组和C组理论成绩差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。教学模式效果的问卷调查结果表明学生普遍认为形成性评价联合CBL教学能调动积极性,学生对老师提供的病例感兴趣,认为可以提高自己的诊疗水平。结论 形成性评价联合CBL的教学方法可不同程度的提高实习生技能操作和理论考试的成绩,可调动学生学习的积极性,提高教学质量,适合在临床教学中应用。

关键词: 形成性评价, 雨课堂, 临床病例为基础的教学法, 医学检验, 实习生

Abstract: Objective To explore the practice and effect of the combined application of formative evaluation and case-based learning(CBL)in the clinical education of laboratory medicine technology. Methods A total of 135 laboratory interns were randomly divided into three groups(group A, group B and group C). Group A:summative evaluation+lecture-based learning. group B: summative evaluation+ CBL. group C: formative evaluation+CBL. The teaching quality of the three groups was evaluated from two aspects of teaching content assessment and teaching effect questionnaire survey. Results The total score and theoretical score in group B and group C were higher than those in group A, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of formative evaluation and CBL can stimulate their interest in learning,cultivate students' ability to think and solve problems independently, increase teaching flexibility, arouse students' enthusiasm for learning,improve the teaching quality, and is suitable for clinical teaching.

Key words: formative evaluation, the rain classroom, case-based learning, laboratory medicine technology, interns

中图分类号: