doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2020.05.004

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness(SCT)in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using optical coherence tomography(OCT)and analyze the correlation between SCT and visual outcomes. Methods 63 consecutive patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after anatomically successful treated with vitrectomy were selected. The unaffected fellow eye was used as a control for additional comparison. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, including the measurement of best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and contact lens slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus photography and OCT examination. The differences of SCT between the groups were analyzed. The correlative analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between SCT and BCVA. Results Compared with baseline, the logMAR BCVA was significantly increased. The postoperative BCVA was positively related to preoperative BCVA(P<0.05). Compared with preoperative, the SCT at 3 days after surgery in RRD group was significantly increased. The SCT was negatively related to BCVA. Conclusion Our results indicate that the SCT is significantly increased in RRD at 3 days after surgery, then the SCT gradually decreased. The SCT was not correlated with the final BCVA.

Key words: rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, subfoveal choroidal thickness, visual acuity, optical coherence tomography

CLC Number:

References

[1] GEIGER M, SMITH J M, LYNCH A, et al. Predictors for recovery of macular function after surgery for primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2020, 40(3): 609-616. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01219-0.
[2] SMITH J M, WARD L T, TOWNSEND J H, et al. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in children[J]. Ophthalmology, 2019, 126(9): 1263-1270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.001.
[3] DELOLME M P, DUGAS B, NICOT F, et al. Anatomical and functional macular changes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula off[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012, 153(1): 128-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.010.
[4] MITRY D, AWAN M A, BOROOAH S, et al. Surgical outcome and risk stratification for primary retinal detachment repair: results from the Scottish Retinal Detachment study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2012, 96(5): 730-734. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300581.
[5] BHARDWAJ G, WALKER R J E, EZRA E, et al. A 21-year study of vitreoretinal surgery for aphakic retinal detachment: long-term surgical outcomes and complications[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2019, 3(9): 784-790. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.002.
[6] MAO J B, LIN J J, YU X T, et al. Comparison of persistent submacular fluid in different preoperative macular status after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2018, 11(11): 1796-1801. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.10.
[7] KIMURA M, NISHIMURA A, YOKOGAWA H, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness change following segmental scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012, 154(5): 893-900. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.010.
[8] AKKOYUN I, PINARCI E Y, YESILIRMAK N, et al. Choroidal thickness after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Ophthalmologe, 2014, 111(10): 954-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2978-8.
[9] IWASE T, KOBAYASHI M, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Change in choroidal blood flow and choroidal morphology due to segmental scleral buckling in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 5997. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05126-1.
[10] SAYMAN MUSLUBAS I, KARACORLU M, HOCAOGLU M, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness change after pars Plana vitrectomy in recent onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Retina, 2016, 36(12): 2371-2376. DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001096.
[11] SELLA R, STERNFELD A, BUDNIK I, et al. Epiretinal membrane following pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(12): 1872-1877. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.12.09.
[12] CHATZIRALLI I, THEODOSSIADIS G, DIMITRIOU E, et al. Macular edema after successful pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: factors affecting edema development and considerations for treatment[J]. Ocul Immunol Inflamm, 2019, 11(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1652330.
[13] MIMOUNI M, JAOUNI T, BEN-YAIR M, et al. Persistent loculated subretinal fluid after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(6): 1153-1159. DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000002565.
[14] JOE S G, KIM Y J, CHAE J B, et al. Structural recovery of the detached macula after retinal detachment repair as assessed by optical coherence tomography[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2013, 27(3): 178-185. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2013.27.3.178.
[15] KARACORLU M, SAYMAN MUSLUBAS I, HOCAOGLU M, et al. Correlation between morphological changes and functional outcomes of recent-onset macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: prognostic factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2018, 38(3): 1275-1283. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0591-6.

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2023, 40(1): 10-21.
[2]	. [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2022, 39(6): 24-28.
[3]	GAO Chunting, YUAN Hui, DU Junhui. Role of binocular vision function in the progression of myopia [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2022, 39(3): 14-20.
[4]	HAO Jianzhang, ZHANG Hu. Prospect of treatment of retinal vein edema combined with macular edema [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2022, 39(3): 35-40.
[5]	XU Li,LIU Wenjuan,ZHANG Li. Reproductive concern status and its influencing factors in gynecological cancer patients [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2022, 39(3): 67-73.
[6]	. [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2021, 38(2): 41-45.
[7]	. [J]. Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education, 2020, 37(6): 35-41.
[8]	. [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2018, 35(5): 19-22.
[9]	CHEN Guang,LU Yanjun,LI Dan,PENG Xinming,CHEN Jianying. Clinical observation of treating canaliculus laceration with consequent lacrimal intubation [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2016, 33(4): 7-10.
[10]	WANG Fengxian, HAN Lipo, ZHANG Yu, LIU Zhenpo, ZHANG Jianli, LIU Xiuping, WANG Zheng. Case analysis on the treatment of congenital dacryocystocele by probing of lacrimal passage [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2015, 32(2): 47-49.
[11]	ZHANG Xiaopeng. Observation on treating effects of idiopathic macular hole with multifocal ERG [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2014, 31(3): 29-32.
[12]	. [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2014, 31(2): 107-108.
[13]	. [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2013, 30(4): 111-112.
[14]	LI Yan. The clinical effect of severe congenital blepharoptosis treated with two kinds of frontal muscle flap procedures [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2011, 28(6): 25-28.
[15]	. [J]. Medical Reserch and Education, 2010, 27(3): 112-.